Green Steelmaking

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Typical Environmental Performance*
| AIR | AIR EMISSIONS (kg/t of CDRI) | ||||
| PM10 | SO2 | NOx | CO2 | ||
| Standard | Low CO2 | ||||
| Charge Hopper | 0.0006 | trace | 0.003 | trace | trace |
| Combustion System (Reformer Stack) |
0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04* | 500 | 250 |
| Dust Collection (typical for one system) |
0.004 | trace | 0.005 | trace | trace |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| WATER | WATER EMISSIONS | |
| Suspended Solids (kg/t of DRI) |
Flow (m3/t of DRI) |
|
| Plant Blowdown | 0.01 | 0.2 - 1.5 |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
| NOISE (Lower values achievable with modified acoustical design) |
NOISE LEVEL (db) |
| Inside the blower area | 95 - 105 |
| Immediately outside the blower area | 85 - 90 |
| Miscellaneous stations around the plant | 80 - 90 |
| At plant boundaries | 70 - 80 |
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reducing Carbon
The increasing emphasis on the environment creates a need for innovative solutions to reduce carbon emissions from iron and steelmaking facilities. One approach is to use natural gas as a reductant and fuel source, since it results in far less CO2 emissions than coal.
A proven method is the natural gas-based MIDREX® Process, paired with an electric arc furnace. Use of 80 percent hot charged DRI in the EAF results in only one-half the carbon emissions per ton of steel produced compared to the blast furnace/BOF route.
Some steelmakers desire greater CO2 reductions. MIDREX® has developed a new concept employing a CO2 removal system that allows for even lower emissions. The advantage of this option is the flexibility it provides the plant operator, with relatively small changes in capital cost, operating consumptions, and operating cost. If the removed CO2 is used for enhanced oil recovery, sequestered underground, or sold into a pipeline, stack CO2 emissions per ton of DRI are reduced by 250 kg/t DRI, about 50 percent. This option can also provide significant benefits for an existing MIDREX® Plant. The use of CO2 removal allows for higher DRI production without adding additional reformer bays, and lowers natural gas consumption, in addition to the benefits of lower CO2 emissions.
It is even possible to build a MIDREX® Plant with essentially zero carbon emissions to the atmosphere. In addition to removing CO2 from the top gas, a system could strip it from the flue gas as well. The recovered CO2 from both streams could be injected underground or sold into a pipeline.
As steel companies become increasingly globalized, they will have many opportunities to incorporate this technology option into their CO2 management plans by installing direct reduction plants in regions with low cost natural gas. In some cases, it may be possible to apply the carbon credits generated in those facilities to carbon restricted regions such as Europe and North America.



